Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 10: 246-257, 1964;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thiers, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Oglesby, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thiers, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Oglesby, K. M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 10, 246-257, Copyright © 1964 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

The Precision, Accuracy, and Inherent Errors of Automatic Continuous Flow Methods

R. E. Thiers 1 and K. M. Oglesby 1

1 Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N. C.

An automatic continuous-flow system was evaluated under routine daily use for six constituents, sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, urea, and glucose. Two parameters have been quantified, interaction between samples and instrumental drift. Results also were influenced by the available amount of sample. Application of correction technics is shown to improve the accuracy of the automatic-analysis system.

Submitted on October 5, 1962






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.