Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 15: 31-34, 1969;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, J. S., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, R.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 15, 31-34, Copyright © 1969 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Urinary Calcium Determination Three Newer Methods Compared with the Clark-Collip Procedure

J. Stanton King Jr. 1 and Robert Buchanan 1

1 Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N. C. 27103.

A manual titrimetric EDTA-calcium technic, an automated fluorometric EDTA-calcium technic, and the atomic absorption spectrometric technic were compared with the Clark-Collip procedure for determination of urinary calcium. All three were demonstrated to give adequately comparable results. Atomic absorption spectrometry compared best; it also enjoys clear advantages of speed and simplicity.

Submitted on March 28, 1968
Accepted on June 18, 1968






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.