Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 17: 89-91, 1971;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Trew, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Trew, J. A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 17, 89-91, Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Comparison of Two Methods for Determining Amylase Activity in Serum and Urine

Kim Y. Chung 1, Ram M. Sinha 1, and J. Allan Trew 1

1 Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada.

Two methods for estimating amylase activity in serum and urine are compared. A method that uses a chromogenic substrate in a kit was shown to be preferable over the older amyloclastic procedure, which uses starch substrates. The precision of both methods was determined.


Key Words: starch-iodine • "DyAmyl" • comparison of precision

Submitted on October 27, 1970
Accepted on November 17, 1970






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.