Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 17: 576-580, 1971;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, K. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, K. V.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 17, 576-580, Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

A Superior Counting Solution for Water-Soluble Tritiated Compounds

G. W. Carter 1 and K. Van Dyke 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va. 26506.

We describe a simple liquid-scintillation solution for use with water-soluble tritiated compounds that is superior to other such systems. Its advantages include: (1) a refrigerated-type liquid scintillation spectrometer is not needed because the solution has extremely good thermal stability from 22° to 75°C; (2) counting efficiencies are high from pH 1-12, therefore eliminating neutralization; (3) a sample is stable for at least one week, with a 7% variation in counting after three weeks (a comparison with counting in Bray's and Triton X-100 solutions is included); (4) there is no detectable phosphorescence or chemiluminescence; (5) toluene need not be analytical grade; (6) for more than 10,000 samples, efficiency has deviated less than 5%; (7) there is no odor (except for the toluene) as with naphthalene "cocktails" (Bray’s solution); (8) cost of the system compares favorably with that for other counting systems; (9) plastic vials can be used (40% less costly than glass) and are easily cleaned because of the detergent qualities of the cocktail. The only obvious disadvantage of the system is that high salt concentrations (>5 g of NaCl per 100 ml) cause a marked decrease in efficiency of aqueous radioactivity, and somewhat erratic counting for the toluene internal standard. However, additional solubilizer will sometimes correct this problem.


Key Words: parameters affecting counting efficiency • Triton X-100 • Bray's solution • counting at high and low temperatures

Accepted on March 10, 1971







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.