Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 18: 150-154, 1972;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, R. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 18, 150-154, Copyright © 1972 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Instrumental and Procedural Sources of Error in Determination of Bile Pigments in Amniotic Fluid

Robert W. Burnett 1

1 Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn. 06115.

Although the Liley spectrophotometric estimation of bile pigments in amniotic fluid [Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82, 1359 ( 1961)] is widely used, the levels of accuracy and precision necessary for clinically meaningful results have not been clarified. This paper delineates some of the important instrumental and procedural sources of error, and how each affects the final value of DgrA455: (a) A limit of error propagation is presented to show that the uncertainty in DgrA455 due to instrumental factors is considerably larger than is commonly appreciated. (b) It is desirable to use a logarithmic baseline estimation, as did Liley, instead of a linear estimation, which can introduce a serious bias. (c) Failure to establish a true zero-absorbance baseline before scanning the specimen can also result in a significant bias in the calculated DgrA455.


Key Words: erythroblastosis fetalis • spectrophotometry • propagation-of-error formulas • diagnostic aid

Submitted on October 1, 1971
Accepted on October 26, 1971







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.