|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 21, 1935-1938, Copyright © 1975 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
1 Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Hartford Hospital, Hartford,
Conn. 06115.
Although the standard deviation is the most widely used measure of the precision of quantitative methods, there is a need to re-examine the conditions necessary to obtain a meaningful estimate of this quantity. The importance of the material to be sampled, the sample size, the calculation of confidence intervals, and the segregation of outliers are discussed.
Submitted on August 11, 1975
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
G. B.B. Kristensen, K. Nerhus, G. Thue, and S. Sandberg Results and Feasibility of an External Quality Assessment Scheme for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1311 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B.B. Kristensen, N. G. Christensen, G. Thue, and S. Sandberg Between-Lot Variation in External Quality Assessment of Glucose: Clinical Importance and Effect on Participant Performance Evaluation Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1632 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B.B. Kristensen, K. Nerhus, G. Thue, and S. Sandberg Standardized Evaluation of Instruments for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose by Patients and a Technologist Clin. Chem., June 1, 2004; 50(6): 1068 - 1071. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Skeie, G. Thue, K. Nerhus, and S. Sandberg Instruments for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Comparisons of Testing Quality Achieved by Patients and a Technician Clin. Chem., July 1, 2002; 48(7): 994 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Witte, S. A. VanNess, D. S. Angstadt, and B. J. Pennell Errors, mistakes, blunders, outliers, or unacceptable results: how many? Clin. Chem., August 1, 1997; 43(8): 1352 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |