|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 22, 843-846, Copyright © 1976 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
EC Dinovo and LA Gottschalk
Toxicological determinations are crucial to coroners' or medical examiners' judgments that drugs are significantly involved in a death. However, differences in laboratory procedures, thoroughness of screening, and limits of detection may result in artifactual differences in the toxicological results and the subsequent interpretations of them. To test this possibility, we conducted a toxicology proficiency-testing survey of nine collaborating laboratories. The results for the proficiency samples point out starting interlaboratory differences in accuracy and precision of detection of drugs. These observed variations in toxicological proficiency may introduce a significant source of error in drug-death statistics and in epidemiological deductions based on these statistics.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
T. Rygnestad, K. Aarstad, K. Gustafsson, and U. Jenssen The Clinical Value of Drug Analyses in Deliberate Self-Poisoning Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 1990; 9(4): 221 - 230. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Brett Implications of Discordance Between Clinical Impression and Toxicology Analysis in Drug Overdose Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1988; 148(2): 437 - 441. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Brett, N. Rothschild, R. Gray, and M. Perry Predicting the Clinical Course in Intentional Drug Overdose: Implications for Use of the Intensive Care Unit Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1987; 147(1): 133 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |