|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 25, 1696-1699, Copyright © 1979 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
DE Bee, GP James and KL Paul
Five methods of assessing blood in urine were studied and compared: sedimentation count, hemacytometry, "Clini-lab" reagent strip and "N- Multistix" and "ChemStrip-8" dipsticks. The minimum sensitivity of two commercially available urine dip-stick procedures for blood was established. The study includes method association, assay variation among and within technologists, accuracy, precision, and sensitivity. Our results demonstrate generally poor association between results by the dip-stick procedures and the hemacytometer or sedimentation count. Results by the last two procedures also showed very poor association with each other.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
M. J. VAN DER WERF and S. J. DE VLAS DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY SCHISTOSOMIASIS: A NOVEL APPROACH TO COMPARE BLADDER PATHOLOGY MEASURED BY ULTRASOUND AND THREE METHODS FOR HEMATURIA DETECTION Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 98 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Froom, R. Etzion, and M. Barak What Is an Abnormal Test Strip Urinary Erythrocyte Concentration? Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 673 - 675. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Froom, B. Bieganiec, Z. Ehrenrich, and M. Barak Stability of Common Analytes in Urine Refrigerated for 24 h before Automated Analysis by Test Strips Clin. Chem., September 1, 2000; 46(9): 1384 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |