Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 25: 1730-1738, 1979;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garber, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garber, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, F. C.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 25, 1730-1738, Copyright © 1979 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

DuPont aca III performance as tested according to NCCLS guidelines

CC Garber, JO Westgard, L Milz and FC Larson

We evaluated the analytical performance of 10 representative channels on the new microprocessor-controlled DuPont aca III according to the guidelines (draft documents PSEP-2, 3, and 4) proposed by the Instrument Evaluation Subcommittee of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. These guidelines were used for the experimental design and data analysis for the precision and accuracy testing, the latter by comparison with an aca II, with results of atomic absorption spectroscopy for calcium, and with the National Glucose Reference Method. From a 20-day replication study, we estimated within-run, between-run/within-day, between-run/between-day, and total standard deviations at three concentrations for each method. From duplicate analyses of 100 samples on the aca III, aca II, and other methods, we estimated the bias from the regression line at specific concentrations and total error from a tolerance limit about the regression line. Analytical performance of the aca III was judged acceptable because these estimated errors were small.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.