Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 25: 2034-2037, 1979;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. K.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 25, 2034-2037, Copyright © 1979 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

The performance of delta check methods

LB Sheiner, LA Wheeler and JK Moore

The percentage of mislabeled specimens detected (true-positive rate) and the percentage of correctly labeled specimens misidentified (false- positive rate) were computed for three previously proposed delta check methods and two linear discriminant functions. The true-positive rate was computed from a set of pairs of specimens, each having one member replaced by a member from another pair chosen at random. The relationship between true-positive and false-positive rates was similar among the delta check methods tested, indicating equal performance for all of them over the range of false-positive rate of interest. At a practical false-positive operating rate of about 5%, delta check methods detect only about 50% of mislabeled specimens; even if the actual mislabeling rate is moderate (e.g., 1%), only abot 10% of specimens flagged a by a delta check will actually have been mislabeled.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
R.P. Channing Rodgers
How Much Quality Control is Enough?: A Cost-effectiveness Model for Clinical laboratory Quality Control Procedures (Illustrated by Its Application to a Ligand-assay-based screening Program)
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1987; 7(3): 156 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.