Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 27: 1824-1828, 1981;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, R.
Right arrow Articles by White, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, R.
Right arrow Articles by White, J. C.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 27, 1824-1828, Copyright © 1981 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

A multilaboratory-evaluated reference method for the determination of serum sodium

R Schaffer, RA Velapoldi, RC Paule, J Mandel, GN Bowers Jr, BE Copeland, DO Rodgerson and JC White

We carried out a statistically designed, multilaboratory study to evaluate a flame atomic emission spectroscopic (FAES) method for serum sodium as a Reference Method. definitive values for the serum pools for the study, with sodium in the 110-160 mmol/L range, were determined at the National Bureau of Standards by an ion-exchange/gravimetry method. The multilaboratory FAES results were judged against the preselected performance criteria for the Reference Method: maximum imprecision 1.5 mmol/L, maximum bias 2.0 mmol/L. The standard error of a single laboratory's performance of the method varied with concentration from 0.46 to 0.86 mmol/L with a maximum bias of 1.0 mmol/L; thus, the criteria were satisfied. The cooperating laboratories performed the method with either manual or semi-automated pipetting. Although both modes of pipetting satisfied our acceptability criteria, only the method with semi-automated pipetting is described here as the Reference Method. The statistical results indicate that the precision criterion can be fulfilled with fewer than four replicate analyses.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.