Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 28: 259-265, 1982;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lacher, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lacher, D. A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 28, 259-265, Copyright © 1982 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

The multivariate reference range: an alternative interpretation of multi-test profiles

JC Boyd and DA Lacher

To test the utility of multivariate interpretation of laboratory data, we developed a multivariate reference range based of the Mahalonobis distance (D2) measure. Results for 20 commonly measured clinical chemistry analytes were collated for two sophomore medical-school classes (118 and 143 individuals in 1979 and 1980, respectively). The data for each test were examined for fit to a gaussian (normal) distribution by using a Kolmogorov--Smirnov test. Those results discovered to have a non-normal distribution were "normalized" by used the of a two-stage log-exponential transform. After this transformation, the D2 distance for each student group followed the expected chi-square distribution with 20 degrees of freedom. For each student's D2 distance an associated chi-square percentile was derived, and a cutoff percentile (95%) was selected to differentiate multivariately the "normal" from "abnormal" test results. Whereas more than two-thirds of the students had univariate test abnormalities, fewer than 7% had abnormal multivariate D2 scores. Analysis showed that the multivariate reference range could sensitively detect minor variations of multiple analytes but could also be quite insensitive to highly abnormal results for a single analtye. The multivariate approach has promise as a tool to avoid unnecessary followup of falsely abnormal test results, but further study and validation in a clinical setting are required.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
E. M Wright and P. Royston
Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 93 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.