Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 28: 471-474, 1982;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 28, 471-474, Copyright © 1982 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Measuring hemoglobin in plasma by reaction with tetramethylbenzidine

SS Levinson and J Goldman

The reaction of hemoglobin with tetramethylbenzidine was studied with a centrifugal analyzer. We found that the hemochromogen reaction was significantly influenced by albumin. Increasing amounts of albumin apparently stimulate the hemochromogen reaction during the earlier part of an incubation and inhibit it later in the incubation. However, during an intermediate period, when the crossover from stimulation to inhibition occurs, the assay is independent of albumin and bilirubin concentrations. Increasing the temperature of incubation or the hydrogen peroxide concentration, or decreasing the tetramethylbenzidine concentration, shortens the crossover time. By adjusting these variables the method can be used with most instrumentation. We developed procedures for use on a centrifugal analyzer or for manual assay (reaction times, 4 and 20 min, respectively). Accuracy, as indicated by a comparison with a direct hemoglobin method (r = 0.990) and by recovery experiments, was excellent. The CV for the automated assay was less than 3%. Plasma collected in citrate and heparin showed good recovery of hemoglobin; recovery in EDTA was poorer.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
S D Christensen, L F Mikkelsen, J J Fels, T B Bodvarsdottir, and A K Hansen
Quality of plasma sampled by different methods for multiple blood sampling in mice
Lab Anim, January 1, 2009; 43(1): 65 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
B. Butler, M. Kurusz, and V. Conti
Postbypass plasma surface tension and its role in bubble filtration
Perfusion, July 1, 1986; 1(3): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.