Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 28: 1259-1271, 1982;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritzmann, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritzmann, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, J. C.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 28, 1259-1271, Copyright © 1982 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Immune complexes: characteristics, clinical correlations, and interpretive approaches in the clinical laboratory

SE Ritzmann and JC Daniels

Immune-complex-mediated injury is thought to play a role in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, serum sickness, various infectious diseases, and malignancies. With increased appreciation of the biological and pathological significance of circulating immune complexes has come efforts to develop appropriate techniques for identifying and measuring them. Common approaches exploit such phenomena as the attachment of complement components to antigen-antibody complexes, the presence of specialized receptors for immune complexes at the surface of cells, and the ability of rheumatoid factor to bind with immune complexes. This variety of assay systems for immune complexes has yielded abstruse results in numerous human pathological conditions. Unfortunately, these results seldom correlate with one another in a given disease. Thus, use of a panel of immune complex assays has been recommended. Indirect consequences of immune complex disease may still be appraised and evaluated with some confidence in clinical medicine: measurements of C3 and C4, cryoglobulins, serum viscosity, and turbidity of serum samples. Measurement of immune complexes may be useful in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring, but it is the characterization of immune complexes that holds the greatest potential for better understanding of disease mechanisms.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. Van Hoeyveld and X. Bossuyt
Evaluation of Seven Commercial ELISA Kits Compared with the C1q Solid-Phase Binding RIA for Detection of Circulating Immune Complexes
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2000; 46(2): 283 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.