Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 28: 1735-1741, 1982;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lacher, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lacher, D. A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 28, 1735-1741, Copyright © 1982 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data

JC Boyd and DA Lacher

We have developed a multi-stage computer algorithm to transform non- normally distributed data to a normal distribution. This transformation is of value for calculation of laboratory reference intervals and for normalization of clinical laboratory variates before applying statistical procedures in which underlying data normality is assumed. The algorithm is able to normalize most laboratory data distributions with either negative or positive coefficients of skewness or kurtosis. Stepwise, a logarithmic transform removes asymmetry (skewness), then a Z-score transform and power function transform remove residual peakedness or flatness (kurtosis). Powerful statistical tests of data normality in the procedure help the user evaluate both the necessity for and the success of the data transformation. Erroneous assessments of data normality caused by rounded laboratory test values have been minimized by introducing computer-generated random noise into the data values. Reference interval endpoints that were estimated parametrically (mean +/- 2 SD) by using successfully transformed data were found to have a smaller root-mean-squared error than those estimated by the non- parametric percentile technique.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Koduah, T. C. Iles, and B. J. Nix
Centile Charts I: New Method of Assessment for Univariate Reference Intervals
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Aguilera, C. K. Hatton, and D. H. Catlin
Detection of Epitestosterone Doping by Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2002; 48(4): 629 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Stat Methods Med ResHome page
E. M Wright and P. Royston
Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 93 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
P. S. Horn, A. J. Pesce, and B. E. Copeland
A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation
Clin. Chem., March 1, 1998; 44(3): 622 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.