Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 29: 498-501, 1983;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadinger, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Kell, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadinger, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Kell, R. T.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 29, 498-501, Copyright © 1983 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Clinical evaluation of Eastman Kodak's Ektachem 400 Analyzer

CL Kadinger and RT O'Kell

We evaluated the performance of the Kodak Ektachem 400 Analyzer in a 16- week clinical trial. We assessed four potentiometric tests and nine colorimetric tests for precision and correlation with results obtained some other commonly used instruments (Technicon SMA II and C800 System, Du Pont aca II, and Baker CentrifiChem). The comparison was favorable for all tests except albumin, sodium, and carbon dioxide. The reagents are stable. Little refrigerator storage space is needed. The computer system and the modular component design of the Ektachem 400 Analyzer make operation, troubleshooting, and preventive maintenance relatively easy.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.