Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 29: 692-696, 1983;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douville, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forest, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Douville, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forest, J. C.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 29, 692-696, Copyright © 1983 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Performance of the Hitachi 705 evaluated

P Douville and JC Forest

We evaluated a new discrete analyzer, the Hitachi 705. The instrument can process sequentially as many as 19 different enzymes or other analytes, with a throughput of 180 tests per hour. We evaluated the spectrophotometer, the sample and reagent probes, and the performance for 11 assays: creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, amylase, glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, calcium, and phosphorus. The total imprecisions (within-day plus day-to-day component of imprecision) (CV) were: for the photometer (six concentrations of potassium dichromate), 0.14 to 0.4%; for the serum probe (55 to 20 microL), 0.4 to 1.0%; for the reagents probes (50 to 350 microL), 0.3 to 1.2%; for the enzymatic procedures, 2.0 to 8.0%; and for the other tests (glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine), 1.0 to 4.0%. Good linearity was obtained in the proposed range for the 11 tests, except for calcium. Comparison of the total analytical error with the medically allowable error at a decision value showed that the test results were acceptable, except for calcium and phosphorus. The instrument showed good reliability and practicability.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.