Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 29: 713-714, 1983;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trinh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trinh, M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 29, 713-714, Copyright © 1983 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Proportion of glycosylated hemoglobin in erythrocytes of a person with hemoglobins A, S, and G Philadelphia

JS Krauss, MH Jonah, SJ Yau and M Trinh

The apparent proportion of column-chromatographically measured glycosylated hemoglobin in erythrocytes from an individual with hemoglobins A, S, and G was only 2.3% because the slow glycosylated variant hemoglobins were retarded in the column. In contrast, the value for glycosylated hemoglobin was 7.8% by a new cellulose acetate electrophoretic method that includes use of dextran sulfate buffer. The erythrocyte metalloprotein, carbonic anhydrase B, was shown to co- migrate with glycosylated hemoglobin by this technique, however. Thus carbonic anhydrase B, HbF, and HbA all have weak attraction for negative charges at acid pH. We believe that carbonic anhydrase B should contribute significantly (at least 10-20% absorbance) to the HbA1 by this electrophoretic method. We conclude that microcolumn chromatography should remain the method of choice for HbA1 determination, that subject-based reference intervals should be used for HbS or HbC heterozygotes, and that electrophoretic HbA1 methods should be reserved for use with both HbS and HbC homozygotes and HbSC disease.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.