Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 29: 1508-1512, 1983;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anker, P.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anker, P.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 29, 1508-1512, Copyright © 1983 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Potentiometry of Na+ in undiluted serum and urine with use of an improved neutral carrier-based solvent polymeric membrane electrode

P Anker, HB Jenny, U Wuthier, R Asper, D Ammann and W Simon

We present an improved Na+-selective liquid membrane electrode for measurement of Na+ concentrations in both undiluted serum and urine. The values for urinary Na+ obtained with the ion-selective electrode agree well with those obtained with the flame photometer. The correlation gives a standard residual deviation of +/- 2.7 mmol/L over the Na+ range of 25-280 mmol/L. In serum, this direct potentiometry yields Na+ concentrations 5.4% (SD 1.1%) higher than those obtained by atomic spectrometry and a standard residual deviation of +/- 1.1 mmol/L. Correction of these values for the volumes of protein and lipid leads to potentiometric values 1.2% (SD 0.7%) lower than those by flame photometry (residual standard deviation: +/- 1.0 mmol/L). Other factors that possibly contribute to this discrepancy are discussed.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. E. Carden, D. Diamond, and A. J. Miller
An improved Na+-selective microelectrode for intracellular measurements in plant cells
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2001; 52(359): 1353 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.