Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 30: 1838-1842, 1984;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosado, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Solomons, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosado, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Solomons, N. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 30, 1838-1842, Copyright © 1984 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Chromatograph with external column evaluated for determining breath hydrogen in clinical studies

JL Rosado, L Torres and NW Solomons

A novel breath-hydrogen analyzer involving an external chromatographic column in the form of a cartridge packed with molecular-sieve material and dessicant is described. The instrument incorporates a sintered SnO2 solid-state sensor into the detector, which registers a change in electrical potential in response to the adsorption of reducing gases; ambient room air is drawn through an activated charcoal filter by a small, internal pump and used as the carrier gas. Once calibrated with a gas of known H2 concentration, a digital meter registers the concentration of H2 in an unknown sample of breath air. The response is linear with concentration up to 160 microL/L. The external column is both necessary and effective for screening out contaminating reducing gases. The correlation coefficient for 250 gas samples measured simultaneously with an external-cartridge instrument and with an internal column chromatography is greater than 0.99. Results by the new analyzer corresponded 100% with those by the conventional machine for detecting carbohydrate malabsorption; for diagnosing efficient carbohydrate absorption, results by the two instruments agreed for 96% of the tests.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.