Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 30: 1168-1170, 1984;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, G. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 30, 1168-1170, Copyright © 1984 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Assessment of analytical bias: four new ways to use recovery measurements

GJ Kemp

I describe three ways of using data from analytical-recovery studies to assess analytical nonlinearity, without access to samples of known concentration. I then describe a recovery-based method of assessing constant, proportional, and non-linear errors with use of as little as one sample pool of known concentration. In each case, I present the theoretical basis of the method and an outline of a practical experimental protocol.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.