Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 30: 1568-1570, 1984;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehnholm, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson-Ehle, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehnholm, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson-Ehle, P.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 30, 1568-1570, Copyright © 1984 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Two methods compared for measuring lipase activity in plasma after heparin administration

C Ehnholm, EA Nikkila and P Nilsson-Ehle

We compared two methods for the direct selective measurement of hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase activities in human plasma after intravenous administration of heparin. Except for the emulsifier (gum arabic vs lecithin), the two assay media for hepatic lipase are essentially similar. Results for hepatic lipase by these two assays correlate well (r = 0.99). The assays for lipoprotein lipase in the two procedures differ in the way that hepatic lipase activity is eliminated (immunological inhibition vs a specific substrate emulsion), and also with regard to the emulsifier. The substrate emulsion stabilized by gum arabic (immunological assay) consistently yielded about three times higher enzymic activity than the specific substrate stabilized by lecithin. Experiments in which purified enzymes were used demonstrated that this systematic difference can be accounted for by the different emulsifiers. The satisfactory correlation (r = 0.92) between the two lipoprotein lipase assays, however, demonstrates that they measure the same enzymic activity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.