Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 31: 1882-1884, 1985;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, A. R.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 31, 1882-1884, Copyright © 1985 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Direct-calibration method for determination of aluminum in serum is comparable with the protein-precipitation technique

C Bradley, FY Leung, W Slavin and AR Henderson

We compared results by two methods for serum Al determination: matrix modification with direct calibration in a stabilized-temperature platform furnace (Clin Chem 28, 2139, 1982) and a technique involving extraction with nitric acid before atomic absorption spectrometry (Clin Chem 30, 1216, 1984). The two methods gave similar results with use of either a deuterium or a Zeeman system of background correction, but gave different slopes for standard additions (mA X s per microgram/L), depending on the Al content of the serum, an effect not seen with aqueous solutions. These differences do not affect the accuracy of the Al determination up to 150 micrograms/L.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.