|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 31, 1974-1978, Copyright © 1985 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
EK Shultz, KE Willard, SS Rich, DP Connelly and GC Critchfield
We used two standard methods (the common percentile and the log-power gaussian transformation) and two novel methods (weighted percentile and smoothed spline interpolation) to estimate the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of 1000 sets of data from eight diverse distributional forms, generated by Monte Carlo simulation. For each distributional form we derived an estimate of optimal performance. Although none of the four proposed methods closely approximated the optimal performance bound, the spline interpolation method and the weighted percentile method were superior to the two standard methods in accurately estimating percentiles.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. Lahti, P. Hyltoft Petersen, J. C. Boyd, P. Rustad, P. Laake, and H. E. Solberg Partitioning of Nongaussian-Distributed Biochemical Reference Data into Subgroups Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 891 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Linnet and M. Kondratovich Partly Nonparametric Approach for Determining the Limit of Detection Clin. Chem., April 1, 2004; 50(4): 732 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Linnet Nonparametric Estimation of Reference Intervals by Simple and Bootstrap-based Procedures Clin. Chem., June 1, 2000; 46(6): 867 - 869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Demirdjian, S. G. Petrie, C. A. Guanche, and K. A. Thomas The Outcomes of Two Knee Scoring Questionnaires in a Normal Population Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 46 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |