Clinical Chemistry Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 31: 465-469, 1985;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Blitzer, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Blitzer, R. L.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 31, 465-469, Copyright © 1985 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Immunoenzymetric assay for creatine kinase MB with subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies compared with an immunochemical method and electrophoresis

DW Chan, E Taylor, R Frye and RL Blitzer

Results of an immunoenzymetric assay (TANDEM-E CKMB) for creatine kinase (CK; EC 2.7.3.2) MB isoenzyme, in which subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies are used, were compared with those by an immunochemical method (Isomune-CK) and electrophoresis (Corning agarose gel). The study involved 200 patients; greater than 500 samples were analyzed by all three methods. The analytical performances were acceptable. Between-method correlation coefficients ranged from 0.881 to 0.975. Two reference intervals were established for the immunoassays: 0-4 micrograms/L (TANDEM) and 0-4 U/L (Isomune) for "normal" patients; 0-9 micrograms/L (TANDEM) and 0-14 U/L (Isomune) for noninfarct patients. Agreement with respect to increased CK-MB as defined by the reference intervals for the noninfarct patient was 96% between TANDEM and electrophoresis, 90% between Isomune and electrophoresis. All three methods are acceptable for use in determining CK-MB, but the overall diagnostic efficiencies for the mass or activity concentration of the isoenzyme and for its proportion of total CK activity, based on the predictive value model, are 92% (electrophoresis, 0-7 U/L), 90% (electrophoresis, 0-4%), 92% (TANDEM, 0- 9 micrograms/L), 88% (TANDEM, 0-3% index), 88% (Isomune, 0-14 U/L), and 83% (Isomune, 0-4%). All three methods can detect CK-MB in serum, but its presence is not necessarily diagnostic of acute infarct. We recommend using the actual concentration of CK-MB to evaluate patients with suspected acute myocardial infarct, and the percentage of CK-MB when total CK is very high.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.