|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 31, 667-670, Copyright © 1985 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
CG Fraser and R Singer
There are many published protocols for evaluating instruments and reagent-kit sets, and a plethora of papers describe the results of evaluations performed. It might be assumed, therefore, that this facet of clinical chemistry has no problems, but examination of evaluations of instruments published in the first half of 1984 shows flaws in some aspects of experimental design and execution, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. We believe that clinical chemists, manufacturers and suppliers, and journal editors and referees can all contribute to improvement of this situation, and we suggest some guidelines for each of these groups.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. G. Fraser and P. Hyltoft Petersen Analytical Performance Characteristics Should Be Judged against Objective Quality Specifications Clin. Chem., March 1, 1999; 45(3): 321 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |