Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 31: 1352-1354, 1985;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmeyer, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Laessig, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmeyer, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Laessig, R. H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 31, 1352-1354, Copyright © 1985 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Adequacy of interlaboratory precision criteria in measuring intralaboratory performance

SS Ehrmeyer and RH Laessig

We compared the predictive value of the various criteria used for grading pH and blood-gas measurements in interlaboratory proficiency testing programs with performance as determined from actual intralaboratory quality-assurance data. The evaluation criteria were the two-standard-deviation interval (2 SDI) proposed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP); CAP's proposed fixed criteria; and the fixed criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS). These were compared with 95% confidence limits derived from the individual laboratories' actual intralaboratory data. We found that the CAP's most- stringent criterion (2 SDI) overestimated the number of outliers (unacceptable results) for PCO2 and PO2, whereas the proposed fixed limits underestimated them. For pH and PCO2 the ATS's limits, which are more stringent, more closely match the individual laboratory's actual performance as measured by conventional (mean +/- 2 SD) intralaboratory quality-assurance practices.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.