Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 32: 171-174, 1986;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pilo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pilo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 32, 171-174, Copyright © 1986 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Components of variance analysis of data produced in a national quality- control survey of radioimmunoassays of thyroxin, triiodothyronine, thyrotropin, prolactin, and progesterone

A Pilo, GC Zucchelli, MR Chiesa, GF Bolelli and A Albertini

Data collected in a collaborative survey for radioimmunoassays have been studied by using analysis of variance to estimate the within-kit (CVw.kit) and the between-kit (CVb.kit) components of the total variability (CVT). This analysis has been applied to the results for triiodothyronine, thyroxin, thyrotropin, prolactin, and progesterone produced by 80-150 laboratories that assayed blind, replicate samples. Total variability was lowest in the thyroxin assay (CVT = 10.9%), associated with a very close between-kit agreement (CVb.kit = 4.0%); in the triiodothyronine assay, on the other hand, the large between-kit component (CVb.kit = 10.1%) increased the total variability to 16.1%. In the prolactin assay the CVT of 19.3% included 17.5% CVw.kit and 8.1% CVb.kit. Assays for thyrotropin and progesterone involve analyses of two pools at different hormone concentrations. The CVb.kit component was very high in the low-concentration pool, both for thyrotropin (25.1%) and progesterone (45.2%); in the higher-concentration pool it decreased to 8.3% for thyrotropin but remained high (21.6%) for progesterone. Applying analysis of variance to the triiodothyronine and thyroxin data obtained by different laboratories using the same kit showed that most kits yielded significantly different measurements when used in different laboratories.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
N A Verwey, W M van der Flier, K Blennow, C Clark, S Sokolow, P P De Deyn, D Galasko, H Hampel, T Hartmann, E Kapaki, et al.
A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease
Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2009; 46(3): 235 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. C. Zucchelli, A. Pilo, M. R. Chiesa, R. Cohen, and Ch. A. Bizollon
Analytical Performance of Free PSA Immunoassays: Results from an Interlaboratory Survey,
Clin. Chem., December 1, 1997; 43(12): 2426 - 2428.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.