Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 32: 1836-1843, 1986;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bolanos, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bolanos, J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 32, 1836-1843, Copyright © 1986 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Enzyme-linked immunochemical measurement of estrogen receptor in gynecologic tumors, and an overview of steroid receptors in ovarian carcinoma

JA Holt and J Bolanos

We tested whether a newly available enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) validly measures estrogen receptor (ER) in gynecologic tumors. We first documented that ER so measured agreed with results by established radioligand-based assays [dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) and hydroxylapatite (HAP)] for in-house breast carcinomas and for proficiency testing specimens. Then, for gynecologic tumors, we found strong correlations between results for ER as measured by the two methods; e.g., for 27 ovarian carcinomas, r greater than or equal to 0.86. The same was true for ER measured in nine specimens of ovarian carcinoma from women who had undergone chemotherapy: r greater than or equal to 0.94. Radioinert estradiol or serum had no discernible effect on EIA measurements of ER, whereas our DCC assay was rendered uninterpretable. Evidently the EIA validly measures ER in steroidogenic tissues, including ovarian, and also in breast and uterine carcinomas. Clinical management of the latter is now based in part on results of steroid receptor assays. For ovarian carcinomas, ER assay can be helpful for determining the probable primary site of adenocarcinomas of unknown origin, and it is providing a rational basis for development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.