Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 32: 1879-1883, 1986;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iinuma, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kumahara, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iinuma, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kumahara, Y.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 32, 1879-1883, Copyright © 1986 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Radioimmunoassay of metanephrine and normetanephrine for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma

K Iinuma, I Ikeda, T Ogihara, K Hashizume, K Kurata and Y Kumahara

Sensitive and specific radioimmunoassays of metanephrine and normetanephrine were developed by use of 125I-labeled synephrine and specific metanephrine antibody, and 125I-labeled octopamine and specific normetanephrine antibody. Specific antibody for both metanephrine and normetanephrine was raised in rabbits by immunization with bovine serum albumin conjugated with the corresponding hapten, prepared by the method of Grota and Brown (Endocrinology 1976;98:615). The detection limits of the metanephrine and the normetanephrine radioimmunoassays were 2 and 6 pg/tube, respectively. Mean plasma metanephrine and normetanephrine values for 24 normal subjects were 62 (SD 14) and 100 (SD 40) ng/L, respectively. Mean urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine values for 22 normal subjects were 154 (SD 74) and 217 (SD 109) micrograms/day. For 14 pheochromocytoma patients, plasma metanephrine and normetanephrine values ranged from 29 to 683 and from 28 to 7850 ng/L, and urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine values were 606 to 6630 and 296 to 4800 micrograms/day, respectively. The present methods are simple and suitable for routine tests or for mass screening for pheochromocytoma.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Wassell, P. Reed, J. Kane, and C. Weinkove
Freedom from Drug Interference in New Immunoassays for Urinary Catecholamines and Metanephrines
Clin. Chem., December 1, 1999; 45(12): 2216 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. G. Wolthers, I. P. Kema, M. Volmer, R. Wesemann, J. Westermann, and B. Manz
Evaluation of urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) kits by comparison with isotope dilution mass spectrometry
Clin. Chem., January 1, 1997; 43(1): 114 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.