Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 32: 486-491, 1986;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dilena, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Skoug, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dilena, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Skoug, J. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 32, 486-491, Copyright © 1986 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Direct ultraviolet method for enzymatic determination of uric acid, with equilibrium and kinetic data-processing options

BA Dilena, MJ Peake, HL Pardue and JW Skoug

We developed and evaluated a direct ultraviolet method for the enzymatic determination of uric acid in serum, plasma, or urine, without deproteinization of sera and plasma. Equilibrium and nonlinear curve-fitting kinetic options are evaluated and compared, and results of the proposed method are compared with those of a candidate Reference Method. All data-processing options yield a linear relation for absorbance and concentration of uric acid between 0.1 and 2 mmol/L; with the equilibrium option, results are linear to 5 mmol/L. For 100 plasma samples, results correlate well between the proposed method (y) and a reference method (x): y = 0.99x - 0.002 mmol/L. Between-run imprecision is about 2.3%, and interference by hemolyzed, icteric, or lipemic specimens or specimens containing high concentrations of xanthine or paraproteins is minimal. The kinetic option with a data- processing range of 100 s or longer yields results that correlate well with the equilibrium method: y = 1.006x + 0.002 mmol/L (n = 118). For 20 urine samples processed by the proposed (y) and a reference (x) methods, y = 1.04x + 0.038 mmol/L.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.