Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 33: 529-532, 1987;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deuster, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dolev, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deuster, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dolev, E.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 33, 529-532, Copyright © 1987 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Indirect vs direct measurement of magnesium and zinc in erythrocytes

PA Deuster, UH Trostmann, LL Bernier and E Dolev

We evaluated three methods (two indirect and one direct) for determining the magnesium (Mg) and zinc (Zn) content of erythrocytes, to compare methodologic differences and to establish a method suitable for use in field studies. For the indirect methods, erythrocytes in whole blood were lysed by adding either de-ionized water (I) or nitric acid, 2 mol/L (II). For the direct method (III), erythrocytes were isolated by density centrifugation, washed, then digested in concentrated HNO3. Mg and Zn concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry in plasma and whole blood for the indirect methods, and in the pellet for the direct method. Hematocrit and hemoglobin were measured, and erythrocytes were sized and counted on all samples. Within-run CVs for the three methods ranged from 2.2% with method III for Mg to 5.4% with method I for Zn. CVs for reproducibility of the analytical procedures ranged from 2.6% with method II for Zn to 4.2% with method I for the two cations. Analytical recoveries of added Mg and Zn ranged from 93.8 to 104.7%. When values for the three methods were compared, those by method I were significantly (p less than 0.05) lower than those by methods II and III. Values obtained by method II were 100.1% for Mg and 102.4% for Zn of those by the direct method. Thus, the indirect method with 2 mol/L HNO3 lysing solution provides a reproducible, reliable, accurate, and simple technique for measuring Mg and Zn in erythrocytes.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Leppert, H. Aberg, K. Levin, I. Ringqvist, and T. Jonason
The Concentration of Magnesium in Erythrocytes in Female Patients with Primary Raynaud's Phenomenon; Fluctuation with the Time of Year
Angiology, April 1, 1994; 45(4): 283 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.