Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 33: 589-591, 1987;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shamberger, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shamberger, R. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 33, 589-591, Copyright © 1987 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 as determined by inhibition with 1,6- hexanediol and by two other methods in patients with myocardial infarction or cardiac-bypass surgery

RJ Shamberger

In this assay for lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) isoenzyme 1 (LD- 1), 1,6-hexanediol is added to serum after total LD has been measured. After incubation for 5 min the total LD remaining is determined. Samples from patients who had a myocardial infarction or who had undergone bypass surgery were assayed simultaneously by the 1,6- hexanediol method, the Roche "Isomune LD," and by electrophoresis on agarose gel. For 101 analyses of sera from bypass patients, correlations were high for results by the inhibitor method and electrophoresis (r = 0.96), by Roche Isomune and the inhibitor method (r = 0.96), and by the Roche method and electrophoresis (r = 0.97). In general, values for total LD were quite comparable by the three methods, but results by the inhibitor method seemed slightly higher and showed greater variability (CV) than those by the electrophoretic method. The assay is simple--requiring one reagent addition and a short incubation--and inexpensive: LD-1 can currently be determined for less than 1 over the cost of determining total LD.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.