Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 34: 145-148, 1988;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forrest, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Yudkin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forrest, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Yudkin, J. S.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 34, 145-148, Copyright © 1988 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Four assay methods for glycated hemoglobin compared as screening tests for diabetes mellitus: the Islington Diabetes Survey

RD Forrest, CA Jackson, BJ Gould, M Casburn-Budd, JE Taylor and JS Yudkin
Academic Unit of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Whittington Hospital, London, U.K.

We assessed the utility of four methods of glycated hemoglobin assay (agar gel electrophoresis with Schiff base, agar gel electrophoresis with prior removal of Schiff base, boronate affinity chromatography, and isoelectric focusing) as screening tests for diabetes mellitus, studying 223 subjects undergoing an oral glucose-tolerance test after fasting and 2 h after ingestion of 75 g of glucose. Assessment of glucose tolerance status according to the 1980 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria indicated that 13 subjects (5.8%) had diabetes, 48 (21.5%) had impaired glucose tolerance, and nine (4.0%) could not be classified (six of these because of missing values). Use of receiver-operating characteristic curves to compare the assays as screening tests showed the affinity chromatography assay to be superior. Assays for glycated hemoglobin after fasting had better precision than post-glucose-load assays as screening tests, and test characteristics of glycated hemoglobin assays on fasting subjects were similar to those of the blood-glucose estimation after fasting. We conclude that measurement of glycated hemoglobin may be a useful screening test for diabetes, and that such measurement of stable glycated hemoglobin is as accurate as measurement of fasting blood- glucose in screening for diabetes. For this use, we found methods that measure stable glycated hemoglobin superior to that measuring both stable and labile Schiff-base fractions.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
R. L. Hanson, R. G. Nelson, D. R. McCance, J. A. Beart, M.-A. Charles, D. J. Pettitt, and W. C. Knowler
Comparison of Screening Tests for Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Arch Intern Med, September 27, 1993; 153(18): 2133 - 2140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.