Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 34: 754-757, 1988;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertholf, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertholf, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 34, 754-757, Copyright © 1988 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Amylase in urine as measured by a single-step chromolytic method

RL Bertholf, ES Winn-Deen and DE Bruns
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22908.

We studied a new single-step direct chromolytic method (Behring D.A.T.) for measuring urinary amylase (1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) activity, comparing results with those by a similar, but two- step, procedure that requires an auxiliary (coupling) enzyme. The two methods gave virtually identical relative responses to purified human pancreatic and salivary amylases. Assay of four quality-control materials to evaluate the total (day-to-day) precision of the new method yielded CVs of 4 to 7%, similar to those of the comparison method for each of the four quality-control samples. Amylase activity was measured by both methods in 110 random (i.e., untimed) urine specimens. Linear regression analysis provided a slope and y-intercept of 0.947 and 4 U/L (x = comparison method, y = direct method), respectively, and a standard error of the estimate of 25 U/L for specimens in which the amylase activities ranged from 11 to 1465 U/L (mean = 358 U/L) by the comparison method. The mean rate of amylase excretion in 2-h timed urine specimens from 95 healthy volunteers, as measured by the new method, was 7.18 (SD = 3.18) U/h, and the nonparametric (95% confidence interval) reference interval was 1.6 to 15.2 U/h. We consider the new method a promising alternative to other kinetic assays that require the use of auxiliary enzymes.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.