Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 34: 1500-1502, 1988;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertholf, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Savory, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertholf, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Savory, J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 34, 1500-1502, Copyright © 1988 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Lithium determined in serum with an ion-selective electrode

RL Bertholf, MG Savory, KH Winborne, JC Hundley, GM Plummer and J Savory
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22980.

We evaluated the performance of the lithium ion-selective electrode (ISE) in the Du Pont Na/K/Li analyzer. Lithium concentrations in 106 serum samples from patients being treated with lithium were measured in duplicate with the ISE and by flame photometry. The slope of the regression line for the two methods was 1.004 with a standard error of the estimate of 0.049 mmol/L (x = flame photometry, y = ISE). Lithium measurements by the ISE method in serum or aqueous standards were linear to greater than 2.0 mmol/L. Within-run CVs for low (0.31 mmol/L) and high (1.15 mmol/L) lithium controls were 5.9% and 1.7%, respectively (n = 20). Day-to-day CVs for the same controls were 9.8% and 3.3%, respectively (n = 20). There was no significant interference when the concentrations of sodium, potassium, calcium, or magnesium were varied, nor did intervening urinary lithium analyses affect the measurement of serum lithium. Results for lithium measurement in four serum-based survey materials compared well with results by isotope dilution/mass spectrometry.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.