Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 35: 2311-2312, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buttery, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beng, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buttery, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beng, C. G.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 2311-2312, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

A sensitive method of screening for urinary porphobilinogen

JE Buttery, BR Chamberlain and CG Beng
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia.

In this screening method for urinary porphobilinogen (PBG), urine is added to Dowex 2 resin under alkaline conditions in a test tube and mixed. The supernate is removed and the adsorbed PBG is eluted with acid and reacted with Ehrlich's reagent. We compared results with those by the Watson-Schwartz screening method, using urine samples from normal people with and without added PBG. At a PBG concentration of about five times the upper limit of normal, the resin method gave a sensitivity of 100%; the Watson-Schwartz method gave a sensitivity of 51%. At lower PBG concentrations of just over and twice the upper limit of normal, the sensitivity by the resin method was respectively 97% and 100%. With normal urine samples, the resin method gave negative results for all samples (100% specificity) and the Watson-Schwartz had 95% specificity. Our data indicate that the resin method is sensitive, specific, and reliable and is superior to the Watson-Schwartz method.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Schreiber, S. Elitok, and R. Kettritz
Solving electrolyte disturbances with the Ehrlich reagent
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1217 - 1219.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Gorchein
Testing for Porphobilinogen in Urine
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2002; 48(3): 564 - 566.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
C. A. Pierach
Porphyria Conundrum
Clin. Chem., July 1, 1999; 45(7): 932 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.