Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 35: 2317-2319, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasic, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wittliff, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasic, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wittliff, J. L.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 2317-2319, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Influence of O.C.T. embedding compound on determinations of estrogen and progestin receptors in breast cancer

R Pasic, B Djulbegovic and JL Wittliff
Department of Biochemistry, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, KY 40292.

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progestin receptor (PR) concentrations in tumor biopsies are important predictive indicators of a clinical response to endocrine therapy of breast cancer. To assess interference of O.C.T. (optimum cutting temperature) embedding compound in assays of ER and PR by radioligand binding, we determined specific binding capacities and affinities of ER and PR in cytosols by a multipoint titration method, using split samples of 14 breast-tumor biopsies, one portion serving as untreated control, the other treated with O.C.T. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups. We then compared these data with those of historical controls analyzed both in the presence and absence of sodium molybdate (10 mmol/L). Eighty breast-tumor specimens (mean +/- SD patients' ages, 59 +/- 14 y) embedded in O.C.T. compound and analyzed without molybdate gave ER and PR values that differed insignificantly from those for 306 samples (patients' ages, 61 +/- 14 y) untreated with O.C.T. Thirty-nine specimens (patients' ages, 58 +/- 15 y) embedded in O.C.T. compound were analyzed in the presence of molybdate and compared with the results for 288 specimens (patients' ages, 61 +/- 14 y) untreated with O.C.T. Again, there was an insignificant difference in the concentrations and affinities of receptors in the two groups. Evidently O.C.T. compound does not alter the receptor status of tumor biopsies.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.