|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 238-240, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
D Brocklehurst, CE Wilde, JA Finbow, R Brett, AE Champion and DG Dewhurst
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, U.K.
This short-term study of the relative importance of estrogen and progesterone receptors shows that progesterone receptor correlates better than estrogen receptor with tumor recurrence regardless of lymph- node status. Life-table analysis has effectively identified only two groups of patients that may be classified by progesterone receptor status alone. Progesterone-receptor negativity correlated well with tumors of histological Grade III; estrogen-receptor positivity correlated with Grade I and II tumors. The earlier recurrence of Grade III breast tumors may explain why progesterone receptor is a better prognostic indicator than estrogen receptor in short-term studies.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J. Martin de las Mulas, Y. Millan, and R. Dios A Prospective Analysis of Immunohistochemically Determined Estrogen Receptor {alpha}and Progesterone Receptor Expression and Host and Tumor Factors as Predictors of Disease-free Period in Mammary Tumors of the Dog Vet. Pathol., February 1, 2005; 42(2): 200 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Murr, A. Bergant, M. Widschwendter, K. Heim, H. Schrocksnadel, and D. Fuchs Neopterin Is an Independent Prognostic Variable in Females with Breast Cancer Clin. Chem., November 1, 1999; 45(11): 1998 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |