Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 35: 238-240, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brocklehurst, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dewhurst, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brocklehurst, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dewhurst, D. G.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 238-240, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Relative importance of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays as prognostic indicators in primary breast cancer: a short-term study

D Brocklehurst, CE Wilde, JA Finbow, R Brett, AE Champion and DG Dewhurst
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, U.K.

This short-term study of the relative importance of estrogen and progesterone receptors shows that progesterone receptor correlates better than estrogen receptor with tumor recurrence regardless of lymph- node status. Life-table analysis has effectively identified only two groups of patients that may be classified by progesterone receptor status alone. Progesterone-receptor negativity correlated well with tumors of histological Grade III; estrogen-receptor positivity correlated with Grade I and II tumors. The earlier recurrence of Grade III breast tumors may explain why progesterone receptor is a better prognostic indicator than estrogen receptor in short-term studies.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
J. Martin de las Mulas, Y. Millan, and R. Dios
A Prospective Analysis of Immunohistochemically Determined Estrogen Receptor {alpha}and Progesterone Receptor Expression and Host and Tumor Factors as Predictors of Disease-free Period in Mammary Tumors of the Dog
Vet. Pathol., February 1, 2005; 42(2): 200 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Murr, A. Bergant, M. Widschwendter, K. Heim, H. Schrocksnadel, and D. Fuchs
Neopterin Is an Independent Prognostic Variable in Females with Breast Cancer
Clin. Chem., November 1, 1999; 45(11): 1998 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.