Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 35: 670, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, D. S.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 670-670, Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Interferographs. Users' Guide to Interferences in Clinical Chemistry Instruments. M. R. Glick and K. W. Ryder. Indianapolis: Science Publishers, Inc., 1987, viii + 190 pp, paperback, $20.00. ISBN 0-930116-07-0

Donald S. Young 1

1 Hosp. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104

p 800: In the first column, the correct name (and the address) of the publisher is Science Enterprises, Inc., Box 88443, Indianapolis, IN 46208.

p 1018: Richard Patrick should be added to the list of authors.

p 1110: Corrections to this paper are detailed in a Letter by Hammer, Vol. 35, p 193.

p 1800: Column two, line nine: "12.5" should read "125."

p 1801: Column one, "Linearity" paragraph: "HDL-C" should read "HDL-FC" in lines nine and 14.

p 1803: Column two, last sentence in first full paragraph should read "...automated method, the interferences with the manual method were less."

p 2017: In the legend to Figure 1, the equation for G7 should read: y = -4012 x + 18. In Figure 2, there should be three dots above the 7 glucosyl units coordinate, the third being between the curve and the point just above the curve.

p 2045: In Figure 1 (right), read "41" instead of "91" in the integration values for the 2-3a fraction assay.

p 2141: Right-hand column, line 16: the formula for CNP-NAG should contain two N atoms.

Vol. 35:

p. 17: In the last part of the equation, "0.0835" should read "0.00835", and "0.0759" should read "0.00759."

p 517: See correction note in "The Clinical Chemist."







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.