Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 35: 837-839, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, J. R.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 837-839, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Unreliable visual estimation of the incidence and amount of turbidity, hemolysis, and icterus in serum from hospitalized patients

MR Glick, KW Ryder, SJ Glick and JR Woods
Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis 46202.

We examined the frequency of occurrence for turbidity, hemolysis, or icterus in 2599 serum samples submitted for chemistry testing in an acute-care general hospital. Each specimen was compared visually with full-color photographs of adulterated serum, and designated as either "0" (containing no interferent), or trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, or 5+. Visible interferents (1+ or greater) were thought to be present in 838 (31%) of the specimens (icterus, 525; hemolysis, 244; lipemia, 69). To assess the accuracy of such visual grading, we determined the concentration of triglycerides, hemoglobin, or bilirubin in the specimens considered to be contaminated. There was little agreement between the actual concentration of each interferent and the assigned grade of turbidity, hemolysis, or icterus, confirming the unreliability of human visual estimation of these potentially interfering substances.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
S D Christensen, L F Mikkelsen, J J Fels, T B Bodvarsdottir, and A K Hansen
Quality of plasma sampled by different methods for multiple blood sampling in mice
Lab Anim, January 1, 2009; 43(1): 65 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. C. Kazmierczak, A. F. Robertson, and K. P. Briley
Comparison of Hemolysis in Blood Samples Collected Using an Automatic Incision Device and a Manual Lance
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2002; 156(11): 1072 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. L. Moreira, C. C. Lansden, T. L. Clark, and M. S. Gawryl
Effect of Hemopure(R) on the Performance of Ektachem and Hitachi Clinical Analyzers
Clin. Chem., September 1, 1997; 43(9): 1790 - 1792.
[Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. L. Moreira, C. C. Lansden, T. L. Clark, and M. S. Gawryl
Effect of Hemopure(R) on Prothrombin Time and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time on Seven Coagulation Analyzers,
Clin. Chem., September 1, 1997; 43(9): 1792 - 1792.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.