Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 35: 1701-1705, 1989;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jewell, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hannon, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jewell, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hannon, W. H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 35, 1701-1705, Copyright © 1989 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Sources of imprecision in laboratories screening for congenital hypothyroidism: analysis of nine years of performance data

SE Jewell, WJ Slazyk, SJ Smith and WH Hannon
Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

We evaluated sources of imprecision in screening assays for congenital hypothyroidism performed between 1979 and 1987 by more than 45 laboratories participating in the national Neonatal Screening Standardization Program offered by the Centers for Disease Control. Reported concentrations were available from approximately 70,000 enriched dried-blood spot samples for thyroxin and thyrotropin, the primary and secondary screening assays, respectively. The most important sources of variation in assayed concentrations are within- laboratory imprecision and the methods or kits used. The importance of each of these sources depends on the analyte and its concentration. In most cases, the greatest source of measurement variation is attributable to within-laboratory imprecision (coefficient of variation 13% to 26%); however, kits are the largest source of variation at the lower concentrations of thyroxin. For both analytes, the greatest relative imprecision occurred at the low concentration, which was within the critical range of the cutoff values for detection of presumptive positive specimens. Imprecision in this range increases the risk of misclassifications. Minimizing within-laboratory imprecision and differences among kits seems to be the best way to improve overall efficiency of screening laboratories.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.