Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 36: 53-58, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindstedt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Unsgaard, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lindstedt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Unsgaard, B.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 53-58, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Determination of prostate-specific antigen in serum by immunoradiometric assay

G Lindstedt, A Jacobsson, PA Lundberg, H Hedelin, S Pettersson and B Unsgaard
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgren's Hospital, Sweden.

A better understanding is needed of the role of pre-analytical factors if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is to be reliably used as a tumor marker. Reports on the analytical performance of TANDEM-R PSA (Hybritech, Inc., San Diego, CA) differ considerably with respect to detection limit and imprecision, differences that might be due (e.g.) to the use of different control matrices, to between-batch variations in reagent composition, or to nonrobustness of the assay. During nine months we determined PSA in 986 serum samples from 728 male urology patients and 54 samples from women (25 assay runs). As controls we used two serum pools with low PSA concentration and two widely used commercial controls. The within-assay CV for patients' samples was similar to that found with the commercial controls: 2.6% to 3.4% in the upper part of the normal reference interval. Precision was worse at lower concentrations (CVs 5-10% at about 0.5 micrograms/L). Imprecision tended to be higher at the end of runs. Assay drift for 100-tube runs was -4%. PSA was stable at -20 degrees C during six months. Neither the polyester polymer in SST tubes nor a hemolysate had any detectable effect on PSA values. Clinical analysis of the first 322 patients and all patients with PSA less than or equal to 0.20 micrograms/L highlighted the requirements for strict adherence to sampling instructions and to stringent quality control also at low analyte concentrations (analyte-free sera and sera with PSA concentrations 0.2- 0.5 micrograms/L). Values with TANDEM-R PSA and IRMA-Count PSA (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) correlated well with no difference in detection limit or with samples from women. Within-assay precision was better with IRMA-Count PSA in the upper part of the normal reference interval and above. The designs of the two assays were compared in a format that is generally applicable for immunoassay kits (NORDKEM kit group, unpublished), and subjective impressions were recorded.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.