Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 36: 1736-1740, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmeyer, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oryall, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmeyer, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oryall, J. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1736-1740, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass

SS Ehrmeyer, RH Laessig, JE Leinweber and JJ Oryall
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

On March 14, 1990, the Centers for Disease Control and the Health Care Financing Administration published criteria for defining minimum performance in proficiency testing (PT). Using our previously described computer modeling technique, we determined the likelihood of passing PT under the new rules. The model relates combinations of intralaboratory CV and bias to PT performance criteria. For example, a laboratory with a bias of zero and an internal CV of 5% will pass a 10% fixed-limit PT criterion (i.e., the criterion for glucose analyses) 98% of the time when five samples are used. The model provides similar analyses for all PT criteria and all relevant combinations of CV and bias. The probability of passing PT decreases as the number of analytes tested increases, i.e., from 98% to 37% as the number of analytes increases from 1 to 20. A laboratory's internal CV has a greater effect on the outcome of PT than do the corresponding bias values. We conclude that a laboratory that operates with methods that have internal CVs less than or equal to 33% and biases less than or equal to 20% of the PT criteria will have a greater than 99% chance of passing PT.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Mahoney and J. Ellison
Assessing the Quality of Glucose Monitor Studies: A Critical Evaluation of Published Reports
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1122 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
G. F. Billman, A. B. Hughes, G. G. Dudell, E. Waldman, L. M. Adcock, D. M. Hall, E. N. Orsini Jr, A. J. Koska, L. J. Van Marter, N. N. Finer, et al.
Clinical Performance of an In-Line, ex Vivo Point-of-Care Monitor: A Multicenter Study
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 2030 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. A. Widness, J. C. Kulhavy, K. J. Johnson, G. A. Cress, I. J. Kromer, M. J. Acarregui, and R. D. Feld
Clinical Performance of an In-Line Point-of-Care Monitor in Neonates
Pediatrics, September 1, 2000; 106(3): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
R. W. Jenny and K. Y. Jackson-Tarentino
Causes of Unsatisfactory Performance in Proficiency Testing
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2000; 46(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Lindemans, P. Hoefkens, A. L. van Kessel, M. Bonnay, W. R. Kulpmann, and J. D.E. van Suijlen
Portable Blood Gas and Electrolyte Analyzer Evaluated in a Multiinstitutional Study
Clin. Chem., January 1, 1999; 45(1): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
P. H. Petersen, D. Stockl, O. Blaabjerg, B. Pedersen, E. Birkemose, L. Thienpont, J. F. Lassen, and J. Kjeldsen
Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with a Reference Method by use of difference plots
Clin. Chem., November 1, 1997; 43(11): 2039 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.