Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 36: 1892-1896, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keyes, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richards, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keyes, L. D.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1892-1896, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Quantitative and functional assays compared for determination of zymogen and activated human protein C

SM Richards, T Olson and LD Keyes
Genzyme Corp., Framingham, MA 01701.

We evaluated quantitative and functional assays for protein C, using either purified protein C samples or pooled normal plasma as assay standards. The purified protein C samples were examined as the zymogen form and after activation by thrombin. Mass concentrations of protein C were determined by amino acid analysis and confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Functional activity was assessed in both standard clot inhibition and amidolytic assays. The accuracy and precision of the ELISA was acceptable, with all three preparations of protein C having similar linear curves. The clot inhibition assay demonstrated marked variability when used according to the manufacturer's instructions; however, modifications to the protocol significantly decreased the CV, to less than 10%. Both activated protein C and the zymogen gave linear standard curves. Pooled normal human plasma gave a nonlinear curve, which contributed to inaccurate sample recoveries. We obtained the most nearly accurate recoveries when we used activated protein C as the assay standard. Amidolytic assays provided no insights into the appropriateness of the preparations for that assay format. A uniform, consistent source of protein C, e.g., recombinant activated protein C, would be useful for standardizing all assays of protein C.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.