Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 36: 1911-1917, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Marcovina, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Marcovina, S. M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1911-1917, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Impact of protein measurements on standardization of assays of apolipoproteins A-I and B1

LO Henderson, MK Powell, SJ Smith, WH Hannon, GR Cooper and SM Marcovina
Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

In 1989 the Committee on Apolipoproteins of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and the Centers for Disease Control conducted an international survey of total-protein measurements of isolated low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and delipidated high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and of their relationships to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) bovine serum albumin (BSA) Standard Reference Material (SRM). Most of the 93 apolipoprotein laboratories surveyed use the Lowry total-protein method. Results reported with the LDL preparations demonstrated a large bias and variation among methods; those with delipidated HDL were not as great, but were similar to those for BSA. Performance improved appreciably with use of the Lowry-sodium dodecyl sulfate method and the NIST BSA SRM for protein measurement. The total CVs, including among-laboratory and within-laboratory errors, averaged approximately 50% and 23% for LDL, 17% and 11% for HDL, and 18% and 11% for BSA solutions by all methods and by the Lowry methods, respectively. Regardless of the methods used, greater variability of the protein measurements was seen with the normally occurring LDL than with the nonlipoprotein BSA or delipidated HDL. The mean CV values for all samples among laboratories averaged between 10% and 15% with the modified Lowry methods; the biuret method gave the highest among-laboratory CV, 34%; the Kjeldahl had the lowest, 7.7%. Use of the same methodology and primary nonapolipoprotein standard is essential for comparability of protein results for apolipoprotein primary standard solutions. This is especially true for apolipoprotein B, because its inherent properties and lability make protein analysis difficult. This study supports the use of a standardized selected Lowry-sodium dodecyl sulfate method traceable to quantitative amino acid analysis as a point of reference for determining the protein concentration of primary calibration reference materials for apolipoproteins.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.