|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 230-233, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
DD Koch, JJ Oryall, EF Quam, DH Feldbruegge, DE Dowd, PL Barry and JO Westgard
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792.
Quality-control (QC) procedures (i.e., decision rules used, numbers of control measurements collected per run) have been selected for individual tests of a multitest analyzer, to see that clinical or "medical usefulness" requirements for quality are met. The approach for designing appropriate QC procedures includes the following steps: (a) defining requirements for quality in the form of the "total allowable analytical error" for each test, (b) determining the imprecision of each measurement procedure, (c) calculating the medically important systematic and random errors for each test, and (d) assessing the probabilities for error detection and false rejection for candidate control procedures. In applying this approach to the Hitachi 737 analyzer, a design objective of 90% (or greater) detection of systematic errors was met for most tests (sodium, potassium, glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine, phosphorus, uric acid, cholesterol, total protein, total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase) by use of 3.5s control limits with two control measurements per run (N). For the remaining tests (albumin, chloride, total CO2, calcium), requirements for QC procedures were more stringent, and 2.5s limits (with N = 2) were selected.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
W. Gernand How reliable are critical error calculations? Clin. Chem., May 1, 2006; 52(5): 895 - 896. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Neubauer, C. Wolter, C. Falkner, and D. Neumeier Optimizing frequency and number of controls for automatic multichannel analyzers Clin. Chem., May 1, 1998; 44(5): 1014 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chesher and L. Burnett Equivalence of Critical Error Calculations and Process Capability Index Cpk Clin. Chem., June 1, 1997; 43(6): 1100 - 1101. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Cembrowski Thoughts on quality-control systems: a laboratorian's perspective Clin. Chem., May 1, 1997; 43(5): 886 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Neubauer The EWMA control chart: properties and comparison with other quality-control procedures by computer simulation Clin. Chem., April 1, 1997; 43(4): 594 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Parvin Quality-control (QC) performance measures and the QC planning process Clin. Chem., April 1, 1997; 43(4): 602 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Westgard and B. Stein Automated Selection of Statistical Quality-Control Procedures to Assure Meeting Clinical or Analytical Quality Requirements Clin. Chem., February 1, 1997; 43(2): 400 - 403. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |