Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 36: 628-630, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenland, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenland, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, C. E.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 628-630, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Blood cholesterol concentration: fingerstick plasma vs venous serum sampling [published erratum appears in Clin Chem 1990 Aug;36(8 Pt 1):1530]

P Greenland, NL Bowley, B Meiklejohn, KL Doane and CE Sparks
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY 14642.

To assess whether venous and fingerstick blood samples yield similar cholesterol concentrations, we obtained both types of samples simultaneously in 108 volunteers participating in a cholesterol screening program. All samples were analyzed by the same enzymatic method in a standardized laboratory, and pairs of simultaneous samples were measured in the same laboratory run. Cholesterol concentrations in fingerstick-derived plasma were consistently higher than in the venous serum (P less than 0.0001), by a positive bias averaging 3.6%. Cholesterol values in fingerstick plasma also were higher than cholesterol results for venous serum placed in a capillary collection tube (average bias +2.4%). The positive bias of fingerstick plasma vs venous serum results appears to be at least partly due to specimen handling, although a true physiological difference between venous and fingerstick cholesterol concentrations is probably also involved. If a positive bias of this magnitude from fingerstick blood sampling is left unadjusted, substantial numbers of people will be labeled "at risk" and referred to physicians when their true values were actually within the acceptable range.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.