Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 36: 719-722, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bramley, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bramley, P. N.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 719-722, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Invalidity of hand heating as a method to arterialize venous blood

JH Green, FR Ellis, TM Shallcross and PN Bramley
Department of Medicine, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.

We have assessed in normal subjects the validity of using hand heating to obtain "arterialized" venous blood by biochemical comparison of results for "arterialized" venous and true arterial (radial artery) blood samples. The heating regimen involved placing one hand in an air- heated box at 45-50 degrees C for 45 min. This method produced blood that was "arterialized" for lactate, PCO2, HbO2, and Hb but not for ammonia or PO2; it had no effect on determinations of pyruvate or glucose in plasma. Despite using a lower air temperature than previous workers, we observed thermal injury in one volunteer. Further, there was considerable between-subject variation in the effect of hand heating on blood gases. This suggests that blood gases should be measured in the "arterialized" samples at regular intervals from the start of hand heating in each patient to determine whether maximal "arterialization" has been achieved, to avoid making misleading biochemical measurements. Given the wide range in degree of observed "arterialization," we question the validity of this method.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.