Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 36: 849-854, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dittadi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bruscagnin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dittadi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bruscagnin, G.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 849-854, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Radioligand binding assay of epidermal growth factor receptor: causes of variability and standardization of the assay

R Dittadi, M Gion, A Brazzale and G Bruscagnin
Center for the Study of Biological Markers of Malignancy, Regional General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Although experimental evidence indicates a probable role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) in clinical oncology, no standardized method for its determination has been yet described, and discrepant results have been reported in clinical studies. In standardizing a radioligand binding assay for EGFr, we evaluated the causes of variability in each step of the assay. Entrapment of EGFr in the nuclear fraction and contamination of the crude membrane fraction by cytosol protein were eliminated through preliminary purification steps. Both Scatchard and Rosenthal analysis of the saturation reaction of the membrane fraction with a wide range of concentrations of 125I-labeled EGF revealed a double class of binding sites. Study of the saturation reaction showed a partial exchange of 125I-labeled EGF with endogenous EGF within 20 h. The present method--incubation of partly purified membrane fraction with 125I-labeled EGF, 0.5 nmol/L, with and without 100-fold excess of cold EGF, for 20 h at 26 degrees C, followed by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 30 min to separate membrane-bound 125I- labeled EGF--shows good sensitivity, precision, and accuracy; is reasonably simple; and may be suitable for routine clinical use.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. J. VanMeter, A. S. Rodriguez, E. D. Bowman, J. Jen, C. C. Harris, J. Deng, V. S. Calvert, A. Silvestri, C. Fredolini, V. Chandhoke, et al.
Laser Capture Microdissection and Protein Microarray Analysis of Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differential Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGPR) Phosphorylation Events Associated with Mutated EGFR Compared with Wild Type
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1902 - 1924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. B. Fawzi, D. Macdonald, L. L. Benbow, A. Smith-Torhan, H. Zhang, B. C. Weig, G. Ho, D. Tulshian, M. E. Linder, and M. P. Graziano
SCH-202676: An Allosteric Modulator of Both Agonist and Antagonist Binding to G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2001; 59(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.